Cloning for Philosophical Transactions of Society -myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theCloning for Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society. Answer: Cloning can be defined as the process by which exact identical copies or organisms can be prepared. Clones are these organisms which have exactly same copies. They are done with the help of asexually reproducing bacteria who help in producing several copies of the same mother DNA (Brown, 2016). This can then be inserted in egg for normal development of organisms or other techniques can be also performed to produce individuals artificially. This is quite an interesting topic for me as humans have garnered the power of producing new lives without the help of the almighty by following exceptional innovative way inside the laboratory itself. For a large number of years from 1958 to 1996, transfer of the donor nuclei from cells present in the early embryos were carried out to develop new cells with the help of egg cells in the receiver. During this time, scientists discovered that cells can be at first modified and then they can undertake the nucleic transfer process to produce new organisms. However all these were done from embryonic stages until 277 experiments were carried out in 1996 and one of them produced Dolly which is a successful clone of an entire organism (Engler et al. 2014). The main exceptional feature that needs to be noted was that this experiment showed that differentiated adult cell can also be used to produce organisms successfully. Usually embryonic cells can activate any gene but differentiated adult cells cannot do so as their genetic information needed to be reset to embryonic stage. This reset process remain incomplete usually but in case of dolly, it somehow clocked and dolly was born. Cloning has a proper relationship with biochemistry. When a clone is produced by mitosis, genetic content of the newer cell is identical to the older cell as the cell remains derived from single ancestor cell. As the process is related with reproduction procedures of animals, it can be considered as biological process (Rodriguez Denhardt, 2014). As the scientists develop the ability to alter the different genetic makeup of organisms towards greater benefit of human in medicine and agriculture, therefore to is highly related with biology and also chemistry. Therefore in chemistry, it can be considered as a replica of all parts or certain parts of macromolecule like that of deoxyribonucleic acids. Hence, cloning can be applied in biology and in chemistry. The process of cloning is impacting in an individual scientist by making him come into a famous debate. It may affect an individual by making him suffer from an ethical dilemma which would be based on the acceptance or rejection of the concept. While some scientists believe it to be ethical as it opens many new fields of experiments and inventions (Tang et al., 2014). Many others believe that they are unethical and inhumane as it affects the dignity of real organisms in the world. Also bringing lives in the world for ultimate sacrifices are unethical as well. Therefore an individual may be entangled in the dilemma. To me, I feel it has a very positive impact as I can foresee myself as an exceptional scientist who is working on production of new organs form live animals. These organs would help citizens by successfully replacing their nonfunctional body organs and giving then new lives to live for. For its impact on society, it is seen that it would help in large scale production of f ood and medicines which will increase life expectancy and make lives comfortable. Moreover many rare species can be saved and their species number can be maintained. However, it also s negative impacts. It is a very expensive process and moreover it will create huge population in different nations which might become unmanageable. These will create impact on economy and pressure on natural resources (Valarik et al., 2014). There will also be lack of genetic diversity and may affect the religious and spiritual beliefs of people which might destroy their religious beliefs. The impact of new research on cloning has surpassed all expectations. Theoretically, cloning is being used to restore endangered species. Talks are in progress to use the cloning procedure and restore the population of giant pandas and woolly mammoths. Skin sample stashes of critically endangered animals such as the northern hairy-nosed wombat are being cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen, to aid scientists restore the number of the concerned species (Shapiro, 2017). Cloning techniques are being used by several researchers to produce embryonic stem cells. This procedure will avoid the need to collect new embryo. The technique is being applied to simultaneously clone thousands of genes and develop a massive protein library that will help in functional genomics. Natural cloning methods are being employed to design crops with high agricultural yield seeds that can be used for many years (Jones et al., 2014). This will improve small farm harvests and create new possibilities for farmers. Th e process has also been used to develop genetically modified citrus trees with enhanced resistance to greening, black spots and canker. The law of unintended consequences is often defined by actions of people or government that may have unintended or unanticipated effects. Since the scientific technique has not been perfected yet, several problems will likely occur (Boudon, 2016). Experimentation can lead to diseases and genetic abnormalities within the clone. Successful cloning shortens the life span of the organism of interest. The environmental resources are always under constant pressure due to population explosion. Cloning would lead to an enormous increase in the number of organisms that would lead to suffering resulting from more competition of natural resources. Moreover, cloning would result in loss of variation or diversity among organisms. If cloning is successful, the growth of all races will get stunted and evolution will halt (Ibtisham et al., 2016). Furthermore, defects may arise in cloned embryos post-birth due to biochemical changes that occurred during cloning process, or due to interruption in norm al functioning of genes. Cloning might one day be able to extend the life span of individuals or confer them immortality. Therapeutic cloning could be developed in future to create cure for complex degenerative diseases such as Parkinsons disease and Alzheimers disease. This would help in eradicating neurodevelopment disorders from the society. Future developments might also prove effective in quashing hunger by cloning meat on a cheap scale to meet our food needs. It might also be effective in resurrecting extinct species like dinosaurs back to life. That would lead to the establishment of a new biodiversity. Having several identical versions of ourselves would be a new experience. The existence of a replica would provide some relief to family members and dear ones on ones death (Mameli, 2007). We might be able to raise a self clone and harvest them as organ donors when we fall sick. Human cloning will also help our similar identities to accomplish different tasks at the same time. My study provided me the information with very little work, we humans will be able to create any organism we want, from sheep to frogs or probably ourselves. Cloning will reduce the time required for designing transgenic animal models and a large population of genetically identical organisms would be available for study. Stem cell cloning would help in developing therapeutic treatment for rare diseases. Although cloning of extinct species seems likely, preservation of endangered species genome and their subsequent replication would help to restore the genetic diversity. However, cloning of humans triggers a lot of controversy and has several ethical, legal and social issues related to it. I do not advocate human cloning due to the risks of embryo health, sex determination, human rights and lessening of human capabilities associated with it (National Bioethics Advisory Commission, 1997). References: Boudon, R. (2016).The unintended consequences of social action. Springer. Brown, T. A. (2016).Gene cloning and DNA analysis: an introduction. John Wiley Sons. Engler, C., Youles, M., Gruetzner, R., Ehnert, T. M., Werner, S., Jones, J. D., ... Marillonnet, S. (2014). A golden gate modular cloning toolbox for plants.ACS synthetic biology,3(11), 839-843. Ibtisham, F., Yanfeng, N., Wang, Z. (2016). Animal cloning drawbacks an-overview.J. Dairy Vet. Anim. Res,3(4), 3-7. Jones, J. D., Witek, K., Verweij, W., Jupe, F., Cooke, D., Dorling, S., ... Foster, S. (2014). Elevating crop disease resistance with cloned genes.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences,369(1639), 20130087. Mameli, M. (2007). Reproductive cloning, genetic engineering and the autonomy of the child: the moral agent and the open future.Journal of Medical Ethics,33(2), 87-93. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. (1997). Cloning human beings. Rodriguez, R. L., Denhardt, D. T. (Eds.). (2014).Vectors: a survey of molecular cloning vectors and their uses. Butterworth-Heinemann. Shapiro, B. (2017). Pathways to de?extinction: how close can we get to resurrection of an extinct species?.Functional Ecology,31(5), 996-1002. Tang, K., Wei, F., Bo, H., Huang, H. B., Zhang, W. L., Gong, Z. J., ... Xiang, J. J. (2014). Cloning and functional characterization of a novel long non-coding RNA gene associated with hepatocellular carcinoma.Progress in Biochemistry and Biophysics,41(2), 153-162. Valrik, M., Klocov, B., Abrouk, M., Frenkel, Z., Kumar, A., Kianian, S. F., ... Korol, A. (2014). New resources and approaches for gene cloning in cereals.Tagungsband der 64. Jahrestagung der Vereinigung der Pflanzenzchter und Saatgutkaufleute sterreichs 25.-26. November 2013, Raumberg-Gumpenstein, 21.